Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 48% Yacht	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	3.13% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	67.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3210M-$52 79,744 User benchmarks, average bench 48% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	47% Average	Memory 70.3 1-Core 54.2 2-Core 103 47% 75.7 Pts	4-Core 139 8-Core 143 19% 141 Pts	64-Core 136 8% 136 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 47% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Sanyo(144D C0D1) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4242 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	3.13% Terrible	Lighting 3.8 Reflection 4.5 Parallax 2.7 3% 3.67 fps	MRender 4.5 Gravity 2.3 Splatting 4.7 3% 3.83 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.13% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSDPR-CX400-512-G2 512GB 3,021 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 442GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM61.5 SusWrite @10s intervals: 322 354 129 99 101 105 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	67.3% Good	Read 342 Write 303 Mixed 300 SusWrite 185 64% 283 MB/s	4K Read 25.8 4K Write 48.9 4K Mixed 29.1 102% 34.6 MB/s	DQ Read 271 DQ Write 211 DQ Mixed 205 163% 229 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 67.3% Great: 103%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5173BH0-CK0 Kingston 99U5469-078.A00LF 8GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	48.1% Average	MC Read 17.2 MC Write 18.8 MC Mixed 16.1 50% 17.4 GB/s	SC Read 12.6 SC Write 12.4 SC Mixed 12.8 36% 12.6 GB/s	Latency 101 40% 101 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 48.1% Great: 48%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 57%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	479x
GeForce GT 650MNvidiaBench 6%, 12,732 samples	86x
GeForce GT 630MNvidiaBench 3%, 7,774 samples	35x

RAM
M471B5273EB0-CK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 51%, 5,979 samples	145x
AM1U16BC4P2-B19C 2x4GBAdataBench 52%, 1,385 samples	70x
M471B5273DH0-CK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 50%, 11,714 samples	42x

Value: 52% - Above average

Total price: $448

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16