HP EliteBook 755 G2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Graphics1.53% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive62.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (70%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
8 years ago, 8 years ago.
SystemHP EliteBook 755 G2  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 221C
Memory5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20151020
Uptime2 Days
Run DateDec 26 '15 at 21:40
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 70%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6 PRO-7050B R4, 5 Compute Cores 2C+3G
Socket FS1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 38.6
2-Core 56.2
23% 47.4 Pts
4-Core 49.4
8-Core 59.5
7% 54.5 Pts
64-Core 60.6
4% 60.6 Pts
Poor: 13% Great: 36%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R4 Graphics
HP(103C 221C) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 13.352.1004.1001
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
1.53% Terrible
Lighting 1.63
Reflection 2.69
Parallax 1.97
1% 2.1 fps
MRender 2.43
Gravity 1.47
Splatting 2.91
2% 2.27 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.53%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7KM240HAGR-0E0 240GB
53GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GXM1 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
62.8% Good
Read 448
Write 263
Mixed 329
77% 347 MB/s
4K Read 20.8
4K Write 47.6
4K Mixed 17.8
80% 28.7 MB/s
DQ Read 144
DQ Write 76.7
DQ Mixed 53.5
55% 91.5 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 62.8%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
15.1% Very poor
MC Read 6
MC Write 4.2
MC Mixed 6.3
16% 5.5 GB/s
SC Read 4
SC Write 4.3
SC Mixed 5.5
13% 4.6 GB/s
Latency 604
7% 604 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 15.1%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteBook 755 G2 Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 755 G2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback