Teclast X16 Power

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 26%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 25.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.97% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive18.4% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemTeclast X16 Power  (all builds)
MotherboardTECLAST Cherry Trail Tablet
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151105
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 27 '17 at 03:30
Run Duration212 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Atom x7-Z8700
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
25.5% Poor
Memory 38.4
1-Core 23.1
2-Core 45.5
23% 35.7 Pts
4-Core 71.7
8-Core 87.4
10% 79.6 Pts
64-Core 88.8
6% 88.8 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 25.5%
Great: 32%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics
Intel(8086 7270) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4835
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
1.97% Terrible
Lighting 2.13
Reflection 2.62
Parallax 2.94
2% 2.56 fps
MRender 2.71
Gravity 2.23
Splatting 3.61
2% 2.85 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.97%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung CGND3R 63GB
7GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0.6
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
18.4% Very poor
Read 131
Write 19.4
Mixed 44.7
14% 64.9 MB/s
4K Read 14.4
4K Write 13.1
4K Mixed 5.97
36% 11.2 MB/s
DQ Read 40.5
DQ Write 21.8
DQ Mixed 3.85
10% 22 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 18.4%
Great: 28%
Generic SD32G SD Card 31GB
7GB free
Firmware: 3.0
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
22.5% Poor
Read 60
Write 16.2
Mixed 17.9
23% 31.3 MB/s
4K Read 7.16
4K Write 0.54
4K Mixed 1.17
438% 2.96 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 22.5%
Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1066 MHz
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
21.1% Poor
MC Read 7.1
MC Write 9.1
MC Mixed 7.7
23% 7.97 GB/s
SC Read 2.7
SC Write 4.8
SC Mixed 3.6
11% 3.7 GB/s
Latency 210
19% 210 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 21.1%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback