Asrock H67M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics47.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive39.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
13 months ago, 13 months ago.
MotherboardAsrock H67M  (all builds)
Memory3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120427
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateMar 15 '23 at 12:00
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User LKA-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
61.3% Good
Memory 82.3
1-Core 74.8
2-Core 150
61% 102 Pts
4-Core 238
8-Core 216
31% 227 Pts
64-Core 218
14% 218 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 61.3%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP
AMD(1002 0B31) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1284 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.11.2
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
47.6% Average
Lighting 59.9
Reflection 59.3
Parallax 81.2
49% 66.8 fps
MRender 59.6
Gravity 67.1
Splatting 43.8
45% 56.8 fps
Poor: 34%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 48%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Dahua C800A SSD 240GB
94GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V4.12.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 44 47 47 47 54 MB/s
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
39.4% Below average
Read 231
Write 271
Mixed 258
SusWrite 47.6
45% 202 MB/s
4K Read 24.1
4K Write 43.6
4K Mixed 17.9
82% 28.5 MB/s
DQ Read 33.7
DQ Write 81.1
DQ Mixed 25.6
29% 46.8 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 39.4%
Great: 87%
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB (2010)-$18
45GB free
Firmware: 03.01A03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 49 48 48 48 48 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
27.4% Poor
Read 47.1
Write 48
Mixed 37.9
SusWrite 48.2
34% 45.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
113% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 27.4%
Great: 47%
WD WD3200AVCS-632DY1 320GB
165GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 79 78 79 77 76 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
49% Average
Read 92.9
Write 95.8
Mixed 60
SusWrite 77.9
60% 81.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
92% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 49%
Great: 50%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$24
88GB free
Firmware: KC48
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 79 78 78 78 76 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
54.9% Above average
Read 114
Write 112
Mixed 51.7
SusWrite 77.9
65% 88.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.9
148% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5458-005.A01LF Hynix HMT351U6BFR8C-H9 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
46.5% Average
MC Read 16.3
MC Write 17.6
MC Mixed 15.3
47% 16.4 GB/s
SC Read 11.4
SC Write 11.4
SC Mixed 12.4
34% 11.7 GB/s
Latency 76.3
52% 76.3 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H67M Builds (Compare 169 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H67M - $104

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $350
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback