Lenovo 82K2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics58.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive198% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 82K2  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220816
Uptime7 Days
Run DateMar 05 '23 at 10:12
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
FP6, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
80.6% Excellent
Memory 70.8
1-Core 146
2-Core 278
88% 165 Pts
4-Core 485
8-Core 728
75% 606 Pts
64-Core 886
55% 886 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 80.6%
Great: 93%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU
Legend(17AA 3A5D) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.30.22
Performing below potential (56th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
58.1% Above average
Lighting 77.4
Reflection 95.4
Parallax 66.9
63% 79.9 fps
MRender 70
Gravity 58.7
Splatting 52.1
48% 60.3 fps
Poor: 36%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 65%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZALQ512HBLU-00BL2 512GB
141GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 7L2QFXM7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1004 998 166 131 120 152 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
198% Outstanding
Read 1,562
Write 1,668
Mixed 1,458
SusWrite 428
287% 1279 MB/s
4K Read 47.8
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 66.1
214% 73.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,040
DQ Write 883
DQ Mixed 958
718% 960 MB/s
Poor: 111%
This bench: 198%
Great: 227%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G44BB0-CWE Kingston 9905700-118.A00G 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
49.2% Average
MC Read 18.6
MC Write 15.7
MC Mixed 15.4
47% 16.6 GB/s
SC Read 17
SC Write 21.4
SC Mixed 17.5
53% 18.6 GB/s
Latency 99.5
40% 99.5 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 82K2 Builds (Compare 4,469 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard

System: Lenovo 82K2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback