Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (98th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 2 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 104%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	3.85% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

15 months ago, 14 months ago.

PC Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-12500H 11,588 User benchmarks, average bench 94% U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	104% Outstanding	Memory 77.6 1-Core 188 2-Core 364 110% 210 Pts	4-Core 700 8-Core 1,047 109% 874 Pts	64-Core 1,516 94% 1,516 Pts
Poor: 87% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 99%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Clevo(1558 A550) 1GB Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4091 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	3.85% Terrible	Lighting 4.7 Reflection 150 Parallax 5.6 4% 53.3 fps	MRender 4.7 Gravity 6.1 Splatting 3.8 4% 4.87 fps
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 3.85% Great: 21%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Ssstc CA6-8D512 512GB 1,235 User benchmarks, average bench 295% 98GB free (System drive) Firmware: ER23401 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2,843 Write 3,224 Mixed 2,738 657% 2,935 MB/s	4K Read 79.2 4K Write 224 4K Mixed 113 384% 139 MB/s	DQ Read 1,424 DQ Write 1,050 DQ Mixed 1,228 920% 1,234 MB/s
Poor: 165% Great: 389%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Wilk Elektronik S.A. GR3200S464L22/16G 2x16GB 284 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 2 of 2 slots used 32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	104% Outstanding	MC Read 39.1 MC Write 38.4 MC Mixed 37 109% 38.2 GB/s	SC Read 21.5 SC Write 42.7 SC Mixed 29.8 90% 31.3 GB/s	Latency 85.2 47% 85.2 ns
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 104%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 109%

UFO

Desktop 101%

UFO

Workstation 108%

UFO

CPU
Core i5-12500HIntelBench 94%, 11,588 samples	535x

GPU
RTX 4060 (Laptop)NvidiaBench 113%, 18,525 samples	276x
Iris Xe GraphicsIntelBench 16%, 72,765 samples	237x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 15%, 7,232 samples	22x

SSD
CA6-8D512 512GBSsstcBench 295%, 1,235 samples	233x
AG4512G-SI B10 512GBGigabyteBench 277%, 1,304 samples	190x
SNV2S1000G 1TBKingstonBench 260%, 75,739 samples	8x

RAM
M471A1K43EB1-CWE 2x8GBSamsungBench 86%, 38,732 samples	103x
CT8G4SFS832A.M8FR 2x8GBCrucialBench 92%, 2,995 samples	87x
8ATF1G64HZ-3G2R1 2x8GBMicronBench 83%, 15,291 samples	73x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16