Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 10VHS1VC00

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics5.78% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive72.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
20 months ago, 20 months ago.
SystemLenovo 10VHS1VC00  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 3130
Memory3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20221215
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMar 04 '23 at 17:31
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 51%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD PRO A12-8870E R7, 12 COMPUTE CORES 4C+8G
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
28.3% Poor
Memory 33
1-Core 52.1
2-Core 96.6
34% 60.6 Pts
4-Core 135
8-Core 143
18% 139 Pts
64-Core 130
8% 130 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 28.3%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
Legend(17AA 3130) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 20.45.40.14
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
5.78% Terrible
Lighting 7.1
Reflection 7.5
Parallax 10.8
6% 8.47 fps
MRender 6.1
Gravity 8.5
Splatting 6.6
6% 7.07 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.78%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB256HAHQ-000L7 256GB
201GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1L2QEXD7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 405 323 321 320 326 328 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
72.8% Very good
Read 501
Write 506
Mixed 388
SusWrite 337
97% 433 MB/s
4K Read 16.8
4K Write 37.7
4K Mixed 19.1
70% 24.5 MB/s
DQ Read 288
DQ Write 193
DQ Mixed 246
182% 242 MB/s
Poor: 106%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 247%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 319GB
297GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 56 55 56 62 62 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
34.4% Below average
Read 61.4
Write 58.7
Mixed 40.8
SusWrite 58.1
40% 54.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
111% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 34.4%
Great: 62%
WD My Passport 25E1 1TB
613GB free, PID 25e1
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 110 108 109 107 112 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
51.4% Above average
Read 121
Write 99.4
Mixed 56.8
SusWrite 109
127% 96.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 0.8
139% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RMSA3270ME86H9F-2666 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1066 MHz
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
23.4% Poor
MC Read 9.6
MC Write 7.1
MC Mixed 9.7
25% 8.8 GB/s
SC Read 4.2
SC Write 4.5
SC Mixed 5.7
14% 4.8 GB/s
Latency 238
17% 238 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 23.4%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback