Today's hottest deals

Pcspecialist Recoil VI 17

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (7th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 93 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics11.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive113% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
19 months ago, 19 months ago.
SystemPcspecialist Recoil VI 17  (all builds)
MotherboardTongFang GM7AGxN
Memory25.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220623
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 02 '23 at 20:13
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-12900H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 1.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
59.4% Above average
Memory 48.2
1-Core 135
2-Core 252
75% 145 Pts
4-Core 398
8-Core 447
55% 422 Pts
64-Core 636
39% 636 Pts
Poor: 95%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Device(1D05 1175) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.3887
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
11.9% Very poor
Lighting 13.8
Reflection 77.8
Parallax 16
11% 35.9 fps
MRender 14.4
Gravity 21.4
Splatting 13.7
13% 16.5 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 11.9%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$95
701GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 659 636 617 893 865 865 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 646
Write 617
Mixed 673
SusWrite 756
152% 673 MB/s
4K Read 31
4K Write 33.5
4K Mixed 31.8
106% 32.1 MB/s
DQ Read 268
DQ Write 102
DQ Mixed 180
134% 183 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 113%
Great: 410%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMS5X16G1A48C40A2-PC 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
65% Good
MC Read 32.9
MC Write 10.3
MC Mixed 33.2
73% 25.5 GB/s
SC Read 9.8
SC Write 14
SC Mixed 13.1
35% 12.3 GB/s
Latency 168
24% 168 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 65%
Great: 156%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Recoil VI 17 Builds (Compare 13 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

System: Pcspecialist Recoil VI 17

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback