Today's hottest deals

Samsung 730QED

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics13.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive106% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
20 months ago, 20 months ago.
SystemSamsung 730QED  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP730QED-KA1US
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230131
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 02 '23 at 00:58
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1255U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
70.9% Very good
Memory 57.5
1-Core 164
2-Core 280
88% 167 Pts
4-Core 462
8-Core 596
68% 529 Pts
64-Core 632
39% 632 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 70.9%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Sanyo(144D C876) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 30.0.101.2079
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
13.2% Very poor
Lighting 14.7
Reflection 94.9
Parallax 18.1
12% 42.6 fps
MRender 20.6
Gravity 21.6
Splatting 16.1
16% 19.4 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 13.2%
Great: 18%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT1000P3SSD8 1TB
790GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P9CR30A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 538 423 187 1098 957 67 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 844
Write 844
Mixed 752
SusWrite 545
168% 746 MB/s
4K Read 23.7
4K Write 30.7
4K Mixed 27
87% 27.1 MB/s
DQ Read 411
DQ Write 136
DQ Mixed 312
220% 286 MB/s
Poor: 102%
This bench: 106%
Great: 394%
SDXC Card 2TB
2TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.4 11 9.4 11 11 11 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
26.4% Poor
Read 152
Write 4.2
Mixed 5.3
SusWrite 10.2
33% 42.9 MB/s
4K Read 9.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
34% 3.1 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 26.4%
Great: 26%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K4UBE3D4AA-MGCR 8x2GB
8 of 8 slots used
16GB Row of chips LPDDR4 clocked @ 4267 MHz
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
123% Outstanding
MC Read 42.4
MC Write 54.6
MC Mixed 48.3
138% 48.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 38.6
SC Mixed 23
72% 25.3 GB/s
Latency 135
30% 135 ns
Poor: 82%
This bench: 123%
Great: 136%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 730QED Builds (Compare 206 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: Samsung 730QED

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback