Infinix INBOOK X2 PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics11.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive245% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemInfinix INBOOK X2 PLUS  (all builds)
MotherboardInfinix EM_TG325_200B_V1.0
Memory7.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221102
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 01 '23 at 18:24
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1195G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
56.1% Above average
Memory 57.1
1-Core 149
2-Core 273
84% 160 Pts
4-Core 332
8-Core 250
41% 291 Pts
64-Core 303
19% 303 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Device(0100 2782) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1692
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
11.2% Very poor
Lighting 13.6
Reflection 20.4
Parallax 16.1
11% 16.7 fps
MRender 8.5
Gravity 18.5
Splatting 13.9
11% 13.6 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 11.2%
Great: 20%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Foresee VP1000F512G 512GB
401GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V1.25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1571 1318 1454 1496 1823 2036 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
245% Outstanding
Read 1,963
Write 2,191
Mixed 1,554
SusWrite 1,616
413% 1,831 MB/s
4K Read 58
4K Write 79
4K Mixed 27.9
165% 55 MB/s
DQ Read 464
DQ Write 420
DQ Mixed 121
179% 335 MB/s
Poor: 91%
This bench: 245%
Great: 308%
Cablet USB 3.0 500GB
311GB free
Firmware: 0209
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 25 24 24 22 24 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
21.6% Poor
Read 50.5
Write 24.1
Mixed 23.5
SusWrite 24
22% 30.5 MB/s
4K Read 2.7
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 1.1
238% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 21.6%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung 53E1G32D4NQ-046WTE 8x2GB
8 of 8 slots used
16GB Row of chips LPDDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
93.9% Outstanding
MC Read 33.9
MC Write 42
MC Mixed 33.1
104% 36.3 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 37
SC Mixed 15.1
59% 20.7 GB/s
Latency 136
29% 136 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 93.9%
Great: 99%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical INBOOK X2 PLUS Builds (Compare 51 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: Infinix INBOOK X2 PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback