Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive	35.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory	2.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1280 x 800 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150206
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 25 '23 at 23:48
Run Duration	149 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-5675C CPU 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	49.7% Average	Memory 66.6 1-Core 100 2-Core 191 67% 119 Pts	4-Core 191 8-Core 192 26% 192 Pts	64-Core 188 12% 188 Pts

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 69GB 15 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 49GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.5+ SusWrite @10s intervals: 188 134 51 55 36 52 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	35.9% Below average	Read 374 Write 271 Mixed 23.5 SusWrite 86 41% 189 MB/s	4K Read 16.3 4K Write 12.4 4K Mixed 7.8 41% 12.2 MB/s	DQ Read 155 DQ Write 6.5 DQ Mixed 16.3 28% 59.3 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 35.9% Great: 72%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
QEMU 1x4GB 2,234 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 1 of 1 slots used 4GB DIMM RAM Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	66.2% Good	MC Read 26.5 MC Write 16.6 MC Mixed 32.4 72% 25.2 GB/s	SC Read 11.7 SC Write 16.6 SC Mixed 14.5 41% 14.3 GB/s	Latency 110 36% 110 ns
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 66.2% Great: 118%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 83%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 74%

Battleship

CPU
KVM processorCommonBench 64%, 2,228 samples	42x
Ryzen 7 3700X 8-CoreAMDBench 76%, 455 samples	20x
Ryzen 9 5950X 16-CoreAMDBench 94%, 174 samples	13x

SSD
HARDDISK 2TBQemuBench 65%, 24 samples	19x
HARDDISK 500GBQemuBench 59%, 94 samples	18x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	16x

Value: 60% - Good

Total price: $485

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16