HP Compaq 6005 Pro SFF PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.65% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 16GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemHP Compaq 6005 Pro SFF PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 3047h
Memory11.9 GB free of 16.001 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110802
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 23 '17 at 17:17
Run Duration237 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 33%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X2 220
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
42.4% Average
Memory 71.4
1-Core 40.1
2-Core 79.6
42% 63.7 Pts
4-Core 80.9
8-Core 80.3
11% 80.6 Pts
64-Core 79.6
5% 79.6 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 42.4%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 4200
HP(103C 3047) 368MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.1100
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
0.65% Terrible
Lighting 0.7
Reflection 1.42
Parallax 0.38
1% 0.83 fps
MRender 1.05
Gravity 0.27
Splatting 1.48
1% 0.93 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.65%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Desktop SSHD 2TB-$90
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC43 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
75.6% Very good
Read 106
Write 156
Mixed 119
96% 127 MB/s
4K Read 0.43
4K Write 5.57
4K Mixed 0.47
173% 2.15 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 75.6%
Great: 108%
TOSHIBA TransMemory 32GB
28GB free, PID 1408
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
6.48% Terrible
Read 25.6
Write 6.7
Mixed 14.6
17% 15.7 MB/s
4K Read 3.91
4K Write 0.12
4K Mixed 0.15
24% 1.39 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.48%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:01 98 99U5584-005.A00LF ID:85 9B CT51264BA160B.C16 ID:85 9B CT51264BA160B.C16 ID:01 98 99U5584-005.A00LF 49GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 0 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 33792 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
22.2% Poor
MC Read 7.7
MC Write 6.3
MC Mixed 8.3
21% 7.43 GB/s
SC Read 3.7
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 6.4
14% 5.03 GB/s
Latency 98.1
41% 98.1 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 22.2%
Great: 23%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq 6005 Pro SFF PC Builds (Compare 268 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 6005 Pro SFF PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback