Lenovo 4284WF5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.96% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive96.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemLenovo 4284WF5  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 4284WF5
Memory5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130726
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 23 '17 at 11:07
Run Duration86 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2760QM-$130
CPU, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
67.8% Good
Memory 84
1-Core 90.7
2-Core 175
68% 117 Pts
4-Core 280
8-Core 417
43% 348 Pts
64-Core 420
26% 420 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 2000M
Legend(17AA 21D1) 2GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 21.21.13.7849
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
4.96% Terrible
Lighting 5.37
Reflection 6.96
Parallax 1.91
4% 4.74 fps
MRender 8.1
Gravity 6.97
Splatting 7.35
6% 7.47 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.96%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ts240gss D220S 240GB
62GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P062 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
96.2% Outstanding
Read 500
Write 405
Mixed 458
101% 454 MB/s
4K Read 23.3
4K Write 83.9
4K Mixed 35.4
125% 47.5 MB/s
DQ Read 297
DQ Write 278
DQ Mixed 85.2
119% 220 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 96.2%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173EB0-YK0 M471B5173CB0-YK0 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
27% Poor
MC Read 8.7
MC Write 8.3
MC Mixed 8
24% 8.33 GB/s
SC Read 8.2
SC Write 9.6
SC Mixed 8
25% 8.6 GB/s
Latency 73.5
54% 73.5 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 27%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback