Today's hottest deals

Acer Predator PH315-53

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics69.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
20 months ago, 20 months ago.
SystemAcer Predator PH315-53  (all builds)
MotherboardCML QX50_CMS
Memory8.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210820
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 20 '23 at 01:37
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User EGY-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
82.3% Excellent
Memory 89
1-Core 120
2-Core 229
83% 146 Pts
4-Core 408
8-Core 592
62% 500 Pts
64-Core 751
46% 751 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 82.3%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060 (Mobile)
Acer(1025 1442) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.1694
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
69.4% Good
Lighting 85.7
Reflection 92.2
Parallax 85.3
70% 87.7 fps
MRender 103
Gravity 76.3
Splatting 76
68% 85 fps
Poor: 49%
This bench: 69.4%
Great: 83%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-512G-1014 512GB
66GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 11101100
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,092
Write 1,809
Mixed 1,305
316% 1402 MB/s
4K Read 37.3
4K Write 95.3
4K Mixed 52
174% 61.5 MB/s
DQ Read 829
DQ Write 565
DQ Mixed 667
506% 687 MB/s
Poor: 116% Great: 239%
Samsung 870 EVO 500G 500GB
405GB free
Firmware: 4101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 332 305 204 106 82 87 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
56.7% Above average
Read 361
Write 362
Mixed 334
SusWrite 186
70% 311 MB/s
4K Read 21.3
4K Write 35.1
4K Mixed 25.8
84% 27.4 MB/s
DQ Read 105
DQ Write 104
DQ Mixed 113
83% 107 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 121%
TOSHIBA EXTERNAL_USB 2TB
530GB free, PID 0826
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 71 73 74 72 74 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
36.3% Below average
Read 128
Write 140
Mixed 19.9
SusWrite 73.5
115% 90.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.5
37% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 36.3%
Great: 53%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CWE 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
65.2% Good
MC Read 27.7
MC Write 21.1
MC Mixed 18.4
64% 22.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 27.2
SC Mixed 22.6
62% 21.8 GB/s
Latency 68.5
58% 68.5 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 65.2%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Predator PH315-53 Builds (Compare 6,301 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Predator PH315-53

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback