Today's hottest deals

HP xw6400 Workstation

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 29%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.79% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP xw6400 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0A04h
Memory3.2 GB free of 8.00098 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20070330
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateNov 22 '17 at 22:12
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon 5140
XU1 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.35 GHz
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
32.5% Below average
Memory 52.1
1-Core 23.1
2-Core 42.4
27% 39.2 Pts
4-Core 74.4
8-Core 91
11% 82.7 Pts
64-Core 92.7
6% 92.7 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 32.5%
Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
MSI(1462 8C93) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.31
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
3.79% Terrible
Lighting 4.47
Reflection 4.31
Parallax 4.31
4% 4.36 fps
MRender 4.24
Gravity 3.93
Splatting 6.22
4% 4.8 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.79%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ01ABD050 500GB-$23
334GB free
Firmware: AX00 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
52.2% Above average
Read 90.3
Write 92
Mixed 91.6
69% 91.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.16
4K Write 0.68
4K Mixed 0.09
29% 0.31 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 52.2%
Great: 62%
Seagate ST3250824AS 250GB-$148
133GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.AH Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
27.8% Poor
Read 49.5
Write 47.1
Mixed 45.9
36% 47.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.36
4K Write 0.94
4K Mixed 0.3
66% 0.54 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 27.8%
Great: 37%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 41GB
null MHz
4096, 4096, 33792 MB
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
10.5% Very poor
MC Read 3.9
MC Write 2.5
MC Mixed 3.7
10% 3.37 GB/s
SC Read 1.6
SC Write 1.9
SC Mixed 2.5
6% 2 GB/s
Latency 153
26% 153 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10.5%
Great: 23%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical xw6400 Workstation Builds (Compare 50 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP xw6400 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback