Performance Results


Gaming 120% UFO	Desktop 103% UFO	Workstation 124% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	118% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	256% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

14 months ago, 14 months ago.

System	Asus ROG Strix G733ZW_G733ZW (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK G733ZW
Memory	53.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20230103
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 14 '23 at 18:45
Run Duration	209 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-12900H 15,403 User benchmarks, average bench 99% U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	98.5% Outstanding	Memory 73 1-Core 174 2-Core 362 105% 203 Pts	4-Core 665 8-Core 960 102% 813 Pts	64-Core 1890 117% 1890 Pts
Poor: 95% ↑ This bench: 98.5% Great: 104%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-Ti (Laptop) 9,134 User benchmarks, average bench 119% Asus(1043 1AEC) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.2802 Performing below potential (43^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	118% Outstanding	Lighting 161 Reflection 177 Parallax 143 132% 160 fps	MRender 162 Gravity 118 Splatting 116 106% 132 fps
Poor: 96% ↑ This bench: 118% Great: 135%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Nvme Sabrent Rocket 4.0 Plus 4TB 21 User benchmarks, average bench 386% 259GB free (System drive) Firmware: RKT4P1.2 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1718 1808 1793 1968 2300 1704 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	256% Outstanding	Read 1,847 Write 2400 Mixed 1,813 SusWrite 1,882 449% 1,985 MB/s	4K Read 46.1 4K Write 24.5 4K Mixed 30.8 122% 33.8 MB/s	DQ Read 1338 DQ Write 33.7 DQ Mixed 66.3 203% 479 MB/s
Poor: 221% ↑ This bench: 256% Great: 515%
Nvme CT4000P 4TB 168 User benchmarks, average bench 270% 3TB free Firmware: P9CR30A Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1710 1685 1654 1630 1624 1552 MB/s Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	242% Outstanding	Read 1,693 Write 1,592 Mixed 1533 SusWrite 1,642 364% 1,615 MB/s	4K Read 51.4 4K Write 23.7 4K Mixed 39.8 141% 38.3 MB/s	DQ Read 1,330 DQ Write 43.9 DQ Mixed 57.5 200% 477 MB/s
Poor: 103% ↑ This bench: 242% Great: 412%
Samsung 970 EVO Plus 1TB 38 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 931GB free Firmware: 1.00 SusWrite @10s intervals: 355 347 340 333 325 313 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	50% Above average	Read 178 Write 309 Mixed 212 SusWrite 336 59% 259 MB/s	4K Read 19.8 4K Write 13.6 4K Mixed 18.2 60% 17.2 MB/s	DQ Read 125 DQ Write 35.3 DQ Mixed 57.5 48% 72.5 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 50% Great: 89%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KF548S38-32 2x31.5GB 680 User benchmarks, average bench 141% 2 of 2 slots used 63GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	142% Outstanding	MC Read 55.8 MC Write 57.4 MC Mixed 53.6 159% 55.6 GB/s	SC Read 17.4 SC Write 42.6 SC Mixed 28.7 84% 29.6 GB/s	Latency 94.7 42% 94.7 ns
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 142% Great: 163%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 121%

UFO

Desktop 105%

UFO

Workstation 126%

UFO

CPU
Core i9-12900HIntelBench 99%, 15,403 samples	782x

GPU
RTX 3070-Ti (Laptop)NvidiaBench 119%, 9,134 samples	471x
Iris Xe GraphicsIntelBench 16%, 72,765 samples	310x
RTX 3090Nvidia $835Bench 210%, 158,856 samples	1x

SSD
Micron_3400_MTFDKBA1T0TFH 1TBNvmeBench 407%, 6,767 samples	323x
SAMSUNG MZVL21T0HCLR-00B00 1TBNvmeBench 333%, 3,134 samples	228x
SAMSUNG MZVL22T0HBLB-00B00 2TBNvmeBench 379%, 1,260 samples	97x

RAM
M425R2GA3BB0-CQKOL 2x16GBSamsungBench 130%, 9,018 samples	313x
HMCG78MEBSA095N 2x16GBHynixBench 136%, 1,099 samples	83x
M425R1GB4BB0-CQKOL 2x8GBSamsungBench 120%, 26,893 samples	83x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16