Today's hottest deals

Compulab fit-PC4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 28%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.57% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive64.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (54%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemCompulab fit-PC4  (all builds)
MotherboardCompuLab SBC-fit-PC4
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141130
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 04 '23 at 13:53
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 54%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD GX-420CA SOC HD Graphics
Socket FT3, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
27.8% Poor
Memory 38.4
1-Core 23.2
2-Core 59.6
25% 40.4 Pts
4-Core 99.3
8-Core 108
14% 104 Pts
64-Core 111
7% 111 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 27.8%
Great: 39%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8400E
Device(1022 1234) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 19.20
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.57% Terrible
Lighting 1.5
Reflection 2.8
Parallax 2.8
1% 2.37 fps
MRender 2.1
Gravity 1.9
Splatting 3.8
2% 2.6 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.57%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS100T1R0A-68A4W0 1TB
897GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 411000WR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 334 253 333 331 353 364 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
64.1% Good
Read 302
Write 334
Mixed 295
SusWrite 328
71% 315 MB/s
4K Read 19.9
4K Write 32.5
4K Mixed 23.2
77% 25.2 MB/s
DQ Read 199
DQ Write 162
DQ Mixed 152
122% 171 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 119%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT102464BF160B.M1 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
15.9% Very poor
MC Read 6.5
MC Write 4.2
MC Mixed 5.9
16% 5.53 GB/s
SC Read 4.4
SC Write 3.3
SC Mixed 5.2
12% 4.3 GB/s
Latency 210
19% 210 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 15.9%
Great: 16%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical fit-PC4 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Compulab fit-PC4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback