Xen HVM domU

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics48.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive42.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemXen HVM domU  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory9.7 GB free of 15.9844 GB @ 0 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, ,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20221107
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateJan 31 '23 at 14:43
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 39%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: AMD EPYC 73F3 16-Core
CPU 1, 4 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
50.3% Above average
Memory 39.4
1-Core 126
2-Core 227
67% 131 Pts
4-Core 354
8-Core 344
47% 349 Pts
64-Core 402
25% 402 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 95%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia A40-4Q
Nvidia(10DE 14DA) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 4GB, Driver: 512.78
Performing below potential (65th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (60 fps cap detected)
48.9% Average
Lighting 60
Reflection 59.9
Parallax 60
49% 60 fps
MRender 60
Gravity 60
Splatting 59.3
49% 59.8 fps
Poor: 47%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 49%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Xensrc PVDISK 130GB
58GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 187 187 192 189 188 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
42.1% Average
Read 357
Write 233
Mixed 288
SusWrite 186
60% 266 MB/s
4K Read 12.2
4K Write 11.2
4K Mixed 11.3
39% 11.6 MB/s
DQ Read 67.2
DQ Write 129
DQ Mixed 97.3
74% 97.9 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 46%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x15GB
1 of 1 slots used
15GB DIMM RAM
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
88.1% Excellent
MC Read 39.8
MC Write 33.7
MC Mixed 30.6
99% 34.7 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 24
SC Mixed 17.6
51% 17.8 GB/s
Latency 205
20% 205 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 88.1%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical HVM domU Builds (Compare 93 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Gunboat

System: Xen HVM domU

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback