Lenovo 80QQ

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.03% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (50%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 80QQ  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Nano 5B6
Memory0.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150916
Uptime48.3 Days
Run DateNov 17 '17 at 16:11
Run Duration343 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 50%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-5005U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
55.5% Above average
Memory 84.3
1-Core 64.4
2-Core 114
56% 87.6 Pts
4-Core 157
8-Core 160
21% 159 Pts
64-Core 165
10% 165 Pts
Poor: 14%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)
Legend(17AA 382A) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.15.4248
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
4.03% Terrible
Lighting 4.53
Reflection 4.96
Parallax 5.81
4% 5.1 fps
MRender 4.71
Gravity 4.13
Splatting 7.57
5% 5.47 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.03%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2013)
289GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
33.2% Below average
Read 59.3
Write 56.4
Mixed 32.4
37% 49.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.39
4K Write 1.03
4K Mixed 0.06
42% 0.49 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 33.2%
Great: 63%
Hitachi HTS545050B9A300 500GB
76GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
13.5% Very poor
Read 30.9
Write 24.6
Mixed 10.8
26% 22.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.31
4K Write 1.15
4K Mixed 0.21
48% 0.56 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.5%
Great: 32%
SDHC Card 8GB
5GB free, PID null
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
3.55% Terrible
Read 10.5
Write 5.77
Mixed 7.28
9% 7.86 MB/s
4K Read 2.98
4K Write 0.02
4K Mixed 0.02
12% 1.01 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.55%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
RAMAXEL RMT3170MN68F9F1600 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
30.8% Below average
MC Read 10.4
MC Write 10.4
MC Mixed 8.6
28% 9.8 GB/s
SC Read 9
SC Write 10.6
SC Mixed 9.1
27% 9.57 GB/s
Latency 73
55% 73 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 30.8%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 80QQ Builds (Compare 1,196 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 80QQ

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback