Google Compute Engine

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 38%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Memory130GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 130GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGoogle Compute Engine  (all builds)
MotherboardGoogle Google Compute Engine
Memory126.8 GB free of 130 GB
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110101
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateNov 17 '17 at 12:11
Run Duration69 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
38% Below average
Memory 14.7
1-Core 88.3
2-Core 177
45% 93.4 Pts
4-Core 327
8-Core 476
50% 401 Pts
64-Core 474
29% 474 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 38%
Great: 68%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Google PersistentDisk 54GB
33GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 46% Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 130GB
null MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
19.8% Very poor
MC Read 7.9
MC Write 7.1
MC Mixed 7.5
21% 7.5 GB/s
SC Read 3.2
SC Write 5.2
SC Mixed 4.6
12% 4.33 GB/s
Latency 362
11% 362 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 19.8%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compute Engine Builds (Compare 28 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski

System: Google Compute Engine

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback