Fujitsu CELSIUS M720

Performance Results


Gaming 26% Raft	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 21% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	31% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	57.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

15 months ago, 14 months ago.

System	Fujitsu CELSIUS M720 (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU D3128-A1
Memory	12 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120720
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 18 '23 at 17:54
Run Duration	113 Seconds
Run User	ALB-User
Background CPU	26%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1603 0 3,589 User benchmarks, average bench 60% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	62.4% Good	Memory 80.1 1-Core 72 2-Core 144 59% 98.7 Pts	4-Core 258 8-Core 271 35% 265 Pts	64-Core 264 16% 264 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 62.4% Great: 65%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Nvidia(10DE 1C82) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 378.49 Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	31% Below average	Lighting 39.9 Reflection 40.4 Parallax 38.5 32% 39.6 fps	MRender 37.8 Gravity 40.4 Splatting 27.5 28% 35.2 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 31% Great: 33%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 53GB free (System drive) Firmware: J4.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 193 212 236 239 238 242 MB/s Performing below potential (38^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	57.6% Above average	Read 216 Write 191 Mixed 206 SusWrite 227 47% 210 MB/s	4K Read 23.4 4K Write 40.8 4K Mixed 27.5 92% 30.6 MB/s	DQ Read 135 DQ Write 152 DQ Mixed 125 99% 137 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 57.6% Great: 100%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5273DH0- Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C M378B5173DB0- M378B5273DH0- 16GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	76.2% Very good	MC Read 29.8 MC Write 32 MC Mixed 27.5 85% 29.8 GB/s	SC Read 13.9 SC Write 10.3 SC Mixed 10.1 33% 11.4 GB/s	Latency 80.3 50% 80.3 ns
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 76.2% Great: 81%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical CELSIUS M720 Builds (Compare 109 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 13%

Tree trunk

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 13%

Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS M720

CPU
Xeon E5-1620 0Intel $345Bench 70%, 17,464 samples	71x
Xeon E5-1650 0Intel $230Bench 73%, 10,189 samples	7x
Xeon E5-2690 0IntelBench 71%, 4,842 samples	7x

GPU
Quadro 4000NvidiaBench 7%, 8,609 samples	15x
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples	11x
Quadro K2000NvidiaBench 7%, 13,526 samples	10x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	5x
HG5d Q Series 256GBToshiba $225Bench 82%, 3,223 samples	4x
840 250GBSamsungBench 77%, 2,100 samples	4x

RAM
M393B5170EH1- 8x4GBSamsungBench 84%, 40 samples	9x
M391B5273DH0- 4x4GBSamsungBench 85%, 136 samples	6x
HMT351U7CFR8A 4x4GBHynixBench 89%, 39 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $373

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16