Today's hottest deals

Asrock X670E Steel Legend

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 216%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 111%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 206%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 106%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics207% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive437% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsrock X670E Steel Legend  (all builds)
MotherboardASRock X670E Steel Legend
Memory56.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit kleuren,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20221215
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateJan 15 '23 at 14:30
Run Duration253 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 7600X-$200
AM5, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 5.15 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
106% Outstanding
Memory 76.8
1-Core 202
2-Core 382
115% 220 Pts
4-Core 728
8-Core 1,122
114% 925 Pts
64-Core 1,328
82% 1,328 Pts
Poor: 101%
This bench: 106%
Great: 120%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6900-XT-$1,000
Gigabyte(1458 2333) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 22.11.2
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
207% Outstanding
Lighting 263
Reflection 260
Parallax 554
214% 359 fps
MRender 414
Gravity 218
Splatting 356
271% 330 fps
Poor: 177%
This bench: 207%
Great: 209%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90
439GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2936 1901 1894 1914 1909 1979 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
437% Outstanding
Read 2,861
Write 3,448
Mixed 3121
SusWrite 2,089
650% 2,880 MB/s
4K Read 79.5
4K Write 217
4K Mixed 115
383% 137 MB/s
DQ Read 1,867
DQ Write 1570
DQ Mixed 1,724
1,290% 1,720 MB/s
Poor: 266%
This bench: 437%
Great: 477%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90
120GB free
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,936
Write 3,268
Mixed 3,003
688% 3,069 MB/s
4K Read 73.8
4K Write 176
4K Mixed 102
337% 118 MB/s
DQ Read 1,902
DQ Write 1,700
DQ Mixed 1,778
1,340% 1,794 MB/s
Poor: 266% Great: 477%
CT1000BX500SSD1 1TB
742GB free
Firmware: M6CR054
SusWrite @10s intervals: 469 462 463 463 463 463 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 511
Write 469
Mixed 422
SusWrite 464
105% 466 MB/s
4K Read 35.8
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 26.6
150% 60 MB/s
DQ Read 166
DQ Write 334
DQ Mixed 36.3
88% 179 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 104%
Great: 100%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
157GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 469 362 359 363 362 340 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
133% Outstanding
Read 519
Write 496
Mixed 448
SusWrite 376
103% 460 MB/s
4K Read 50.2
4K Write 131
4K Mixed 68.7
233% 83.3 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 363
DQ Mixed 372
280% 374 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 133%
Great: 129%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$87
6.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 179 180 180 182 181 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
84.8% Excellent
Read 116
Write 157
Mixed 75.9
SusWrite 180
97% 132 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
76% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 84.8%
Great: 90%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50
2TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 109 109 118 104 114 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
67.9% Good
Read 124
Write 121
Mixed 52.3
SusWrite 112
75% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 0.7
153% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 67.9%
Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMH32GX5M2B5600C36 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
123% Outstanding
MC Read 46
MC Write 42.8
MC Mixed 41.8
124% 43.5 GB/s
SC Read 46.6
SC Write 45.5
SC Mixed 41.9
128% 44.7 GB/s
Latency 86.7
46% 86.7 ns
Poor: 123%
This bench: 123%
Great: 192%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X670E Steel Legend Builds (Compare 114 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 412%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 421%
UFO

System: Asrock X670E Steel Legend

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $2,344
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $144
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $70
Intel Core i5-13600K $230Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback