Today's hottest deals

Casper NIRVANA ONE A600

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics9.11% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive156% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemCasper NIRVANA ONE A600  (all builds)
MotherboardCASPER TGL 001
Memory8.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220514
Uptime1.7 Days
Run DateJan 11 '23 at 08:02
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1165G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
50.7% Above average
Memory 46.9
1-Core 116
2-Core 208
66% 124 Pts
4-Core 303
8-Core 371
44% 337 Pts
64-Core 386
24% 386 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.1999
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
9.11% Terrible
Lighting 10.6
Reflection 11.9
Parallax 13.4
9% 12 fps
MRender 10.5
Gravity 14.2
Splatting 12
10% 12.2 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 9.11%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kioxia-exceria SSD 500GB
407GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFA12.b
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1424 1256 694 677 704 655 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
156% Outstanding
Read 730
Write 1,227
Mixed 850
SusWrite 902
211% 927 MB/s
4K Read 29.2
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 39.1
148% 56.8 MB/s
DQ Read 744
DQ Write 423
DQ Mixed 582
433% 583 MB/s
Poor: 110%
This bench: 156%
Great: 240%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G4SFRA32A.C16FR 1x16GB
1 of 1 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
29.7% Poor
MC Read 6.9
MC Write 16.8
MC Mixed 8.6
31% 10.8 GB/s
SC Read 4
SC Write 12.7
SC Mixed 6.6
22% 7.77 GB/s
Latency 173
23% 173 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 29.7%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical NIRVANA ONE A600 Builds (Compare 17 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Casper NIRVANA ONE A600

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback