Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 81WQ

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 31%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.84% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive64.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 81WQ  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory0.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210722
Uptime2.4 Days
Run DateJan 05 '23 at 01:45
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 36%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium Silver N5030
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 1.45 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
28.4% Poor
Memory 40.2
1-Core 43
2-Core 81
32% 54.7 Pts
4-Core 96.5
8-Core 102
13% 99.2 Pts
64-Core 102
6% 102 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 28.4%
Great: 46%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 605
Legend(17AA 3FB4) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9864
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
0.84% Terrible
Lighting 1
Reflection 0.9
Parallax 1.9
1% 1.27 fps
MRender 1.7
Gravity 1.8
Splatting 0.2
1% 1.23 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.84%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ssstc CL1-4D128 128GB
70GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1S262
SusWrite @10s intervals: 404 138 109 117 113 115 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
64.1% Good
Read 473
Write 412
Mixed 434
SusWrite 166
83% 372 MB/s
4K Read 26.1
4K Write 44.6
4K Mixed 16
84% 28.9 MB/s
DQ Read 275
DQ Write 193
DQ Mixed 245
180% 238 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 128%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung 1x4GB
1 of 1 slots used
4GB Row of chips DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
16.2% Very poor
MC Read 6.3
MC Write 5.5
MC Mixed 5.6
17% 5.8 GB/s
SC Read 2.6
SC Write 3.8
SC Mixed 3.7
10% 3.37 GB/s
Latency 201
20% 201 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 16.2%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 81WQ Builds (Compare 393 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 27%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 81WQ

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback