Today's hottest deals

Lenovo F0GJ007EAX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics35.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive180% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo F0GJ007EAX  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 375C
Memory8.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220815
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateJan 02 '23 at 16:43
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User ARE-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1260P
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
77.1% Very good
Memory 41.8
1-Core 184
2-Core 325
92% 184 Pts
4-Core 602
8-Core 861
92% 731 Pts
64-Core 1,416
88% 1,416 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 77.1%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce MX550
Legend(17AA 375C) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.1661
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
35.4% Below average
Lighting 45.8
Reflection 31.3
Parallax 47.8
37% 41.6 fps
MRender 31.5
Gravity 46.4
Splatting 37.7
32% 38.5 fps
Poor: 20%
This bench: 35.4%
Great: 35%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme INTEL SSDPEKNU512GZL 512GB
356GB free (System drive)
Firmware: L01C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 888 1070 1133 1262 1320 1361 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
180% Outstanding
Read 1,171
Write 809
Mixed 771
SusWrite 1,172
220% 981 MB/s
4K Read 39.4
4K Write 69.6
4K Mixed 46
156% 51.7 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 308
223% 294 MB/s
Poor: 113%
This bench: 180%
Great: 279%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43EB1-CWE 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
68.3% Good
MC Read 22.6
MC Write 29.8
MC Mixed 24.6
73% 25.7 GB/s
SC Read 15.1
SC Write 31.3
SC Mixed 10
54% 18.8 GB/s
Latency 194
21% 194 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 68.3%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical F0GJ007EAX Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

System: Lenovo F0GJ007EAX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback