QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory76GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 76GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (80%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory69.7 GB free of 76 GB @ 0 GHz
Display800 x 600 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210616
Uptime19.8 Days
Run DateJan 02 '23 at 09:10
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 80%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD EPYC 7J13 64-Core
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.55 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
39.9% Below average
Memory 45.5
1-Core 58.4
2-Core 106
40% 70.1 Pts
4-Core 185
8-Core 315
30% 250 Pts
64-Core 344
21% 344 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 79%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Oracle BlockVolume 50GB
19GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 48 45 44 46 46 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
26.9% Poor
Read 45.5
Write 85.2
Mixed 48.7
SusWrite 47.5
42% 56.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1.6
278% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 26.9%
Great: 31%
Oracle BlockVolume 215GB
200GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 98 91 98 96 94 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
50.4% Above average
Read 80.4
Write 122
Mixed 95.8
SusWrite 95
73% 98.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1.2
214% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 76GB
0, 0, 0, 0, 0 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 12288 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
123% Outstanding
MC Read 44.2
MC Write 48
MC Mixed 56.9
142% 49.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 24.5
SC Mixed 23.6
59% 20.6 GB/s
Latency 178
22% 178 ns
Poor: 86%
This bench: 123%
Great: 123%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996) Builds (Compare 97 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 124%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 127%
UFO

System: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $350
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback