Today's hottest deals

Acer NG-F5-573G-76QS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.52% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive32.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (53%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer NG-F5-573G-76QS  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Ironman_SK
Memory9.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170526
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 30 '22 at 12:39
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU 53%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6500U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
52.8% Above average
Memory 73.8
1-Core 72.2
2-Core 132
56% 92.6 Pts
4-Core 185
8-Core 193
25% 189 Pts
64-Core 183
11% 183 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)
Acer(1025 1094) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1340
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
3.52% Terrible
Lighting 4.9
Reflection 13.1
Parallax 4.7
4% 7.57 fps
MRender 5.1
Gravity 5.4
Splatting 0.3
3% 3.6 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.52%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
S500 128GB
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0722A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 84 55 48 69 67 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
32.5% Below average
Read 301
Write 195
Mixed 250
SusWrite 76.9
46% 206 MB/s
4K Read 9
4K Write 18.9
4K Mixed 9.7
36% 12.5 MB/s
DQ Read 169
DQ Write 42.4
DQ Mixed 37.1
45% 83 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 32.5%
Great: 92%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB
782GB free
Firmware: 2BA30001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 72 75 80 74 77 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
43% Average
Read 73.3
Write 70.9
Mixed 46.3
SusWrite 76.5
49% 66.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
115% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 43%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA82GS6MFR8N-TF 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
34.8% Below average
MC Read 12.4
MC Write 11.9
MC Mixed 10.9
34% 11.7 GB/s
SC Read 10.3
SC Write 11
SC Mixed 10.9
31% 10.7 GB/s
Latency 92.9
43% 92.9 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 34.8%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical NG-F5-573G-76QS Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Acer NG-F5-573G-76QS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback