Today's hottest deals

bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics71.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.
Run History
22 months ago, 22 months ago.
SystemVMware, VMware Virtual Platform
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory26.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181212
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateDec 28 '22 at 18:54
Run Duration83 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2643 v3
CPU #000, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
75.1% Very good
Memory 78.1
1-Core 97.2
2-Core 198
71% 125 Pts
4-Core 388
8-Core 579
60% 484 Pts
64-Core 560
35% 560 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 75.1%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Pro WX 9100
HP(103C 0B0F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1500 MHz, MLim: 945 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver:
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
71.2% Very good
Lighting 89.5
Reflection 97.3
Parallax 149
73% 112 fps
MRender 82.1
Gravity 102
Splatting 69.1
68% 84.4 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 79%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual NVMe Disk 107GB
44GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,145
Write 1,045
Mixed 575
204% 922 MB/s
4K Read 33.3
4K Write 65.8
4K Mixed 39.4
136% 46.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,006
DQ Write 600
DQ Mixed 787
590% 798 MB/s
Poor: 46% Great: 177%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x16GB
2 of 128 slots used
32GB DIMM DRAM
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
19.5% Very poor
MC Read 5.3
MC Write 6.3
MC Mixed 5.6
16% 5.73 GB/s
SC Read 5.3
SC Write 7.4
SC Mixed 6.2
18% 6.3 GB/s
Latency 84.2
48% 84.2 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 19.5%
Great: 164%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 25,032 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $278WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback