Lenovo 82K0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics41.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 82K0  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory1.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210718
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 27 '22 at 15:47
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
FP6, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
75.4% Very good
Memory 77.6
1-Core 151
2-Core 292
93% 174 Pts
4-Core 393
8-Core 774
69% 584 Pts
64-Core 1040
64% 1040 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 75.4%
Great: 93%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
Legend(17AA 3A85) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1785 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 512.36
Performing below potential (63rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
41.9% Average
Lighting 52.4
Reflection 53.4
Parallax 48.8
43% 51.5 fps
MRender 60.4
Gravity 47.8
Splatting 43
40% 50.4 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 41.9%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZALQ256HBJD-00BL2 256GB
42GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5L2QFXM7
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,472
Write 1,124
Mixed 1,192
281% 1,263 MB/s
4K Read 43.7
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 60
201% 71 MB/s
DQ Read 837
DQ Write 734
DQ Mixed 802
596% 791 MB/s
Poor: 83% Great: 206%
ST500LT0 12-9WS142 500GB
386GB free, PID 5106
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 97 99 99 100 98 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
36.7% Below average
Read 89.5
Write 92
Mixed 54.2
SusWrite 98.5
113% 83.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.6
46% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 36.7%
Great: 37%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E2 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
44.1% Average
MC Read 17.3
MC Write 11.9
MC Mixed 13.2
40% 14.1 GB/s
SC Read 19.6
SC Write 16.8
SC Mixed 18.4
52% 18.3 GB/s
Latency 85.1
47% 85.1 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 82K0 Builds (Compare 236 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft

System: Lenovo 82K0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback