Today's hottest deals

Default string

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics53.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive88% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
22 months ago, 22 months ago.
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardINTEL SKYBAY
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170920
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 24 '22 at 20:56
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 22%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-7101E
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
59.6% Above average
Memory 75.9
1-Core 104
2-Core 180
69% 120 Pts
4-Core 250
8-Core 266
34% 258 Pts
64-Core 266
16% 266 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1360 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.20.27.07
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
53.8% Above average
Lighting 68.3
Reflection 62.4
Parallax 103
56% 77.8 fps
MRender 64.7
Gravity 77.9
Splatting 46.8
50% 63.1 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 53.8%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS500G2B0B-00YS70 500GB
342GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 415020WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 243 214 215 213 216 214 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
88% Excellent
Read 461
Write 277
Mixed 248
SusWrite 219
67% 301 MB/s
4K Read 23.6
4K Write 72.8
4K Mixed 42.3
128% 46.2 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 317
DQ Mixed 248
214% 316 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 88%
Great: 114%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 225 207 221 223 236 150 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
82.2% Excellent
Read 465
Write 450
Mixed 428
SusWrite 210
87% 389 MB/s
4K Read 28.8
4K Write 53
4K Mixed 36.5
118% 39.4 MB/s
DQ Read 345
DQ Write 271
DQ Mixed 292
223% 303 MB/s
Poor: 113%
This bench: 82.2%
Great: 541%
Samsung 860 EVO 500G 431GB
402GB free
Firmware: RVT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 228 210 225 226 240 153 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
82.8% Excellent
Read 527
Write 449
Mixed 389
SusWrite 214
88% 395 MB/s
4K Read 29.3
4K Write 56.9
4K Mixed 35.9
120% 40.7 MB/s
DQ Read 229
DQ Write 272
DQ Mixed 253
190% 252 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 82.8%
Great: 121%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905624-051.A00G 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
72.9% Very good
MC Read 27.3
MC Write 30.6
MC Mixed 23.5
78% 27.1 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 22.5
SC Mixed 19.1
50% 17.6 GB/s
Latency 88.6
45% 88.6 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 72.9%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical string Builds (Compare 15,350 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $381
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback