Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (2nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 98 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 22.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive	27% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP EliteBook Folio 9470m (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 18DF
Memory	12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130522
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 18 '22 at 17:32
Run Duration	128 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3687U 2,933 User benchmarks, average bench 53% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	22.1% Poor	Memory 29.9 1-Core 21.4 2-Core 39.3 19% 30.2 Pts	4-Core 80.5 8-Core 100 12% 90.4 Pts	64-Core 84.5 5% 84.5 Pts
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 22.1% Great: 61%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109 201,200 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 903GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVQ02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 132 131 127 127 123 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	27% Poor	Read 92.4 Write 120 Mixed 121 SusWrite 129 26% 115 MB/s	4K Read 5.7 4K Write 12 4K Mixed 6.8 24% 8.17 MB/s	DQ Read 207 DQ Write 163 DQ Mixed 196 143% 188 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 27% Great: 121%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT41GS6MFR8C-PB Samsung M471B1G73BH0-CK0 16GB 43 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	29.5% Poor	MC Read 11.6 MC Write 12.8 MC Mixed 11 34% 11.8 GB/s	SC Read 3.4 SC Write 3.6 SC Mixed 4 10% 3.67 GB/s	Latency 255 16% 255 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 29.5% Great: 56%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 50%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	952x
Ivy 4PhdgdBench 4%, 153 samples	1x

SSD
SSD Pro 1500 Series 180GBIntel $209Bench 69%, 7,834 samples	65x
520 Series 180GBIntel $132Bench 72%, 14,258 samples	41x
C400 RealSSD 256GBMicronBench 55%, 11,652 samples	27x

RAM
HMT351S6EFR8A-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 50%, 13,765 samples	28x
M471B5173QH0-YK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 48%, 30,873 samples	25x
M471B5173DB0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 24%, 51,191 samples	23x

Value: 4% - Terrible

Total price: $209

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16