Performance Results

Gaming 166%
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation 170%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics196% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory25.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220427
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 16 '22 at 21:54
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$154
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
86.1% Excellent
Memory 75
1-Core 144
2-Core 281
89% 166 Pts
4-Core 521
8-Core 910
86% 715 Pts
64-Core 1,434
89% 1,434 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 86.1%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6900-XT-$1,000
Gigabyte(1458 232C) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 22.11.2
Performing below potential (52nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
196% Outstanding
Lighting 247
Reflection 249
Parallax 530
201% 342 fps
MRender 393
Gravity 210
Splatting 331
255% 311 fps
Poor: 177%
This bench: 196%
Great: 209%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX100 250GB-$141
73GB free
Firmware: MU01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 343 345 347 355 356 355 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
89.9% Excellent
Read 438
Write 340
Mixed 283
SusWrite 350
79% 353 MB/s
4K Read 27.5
4K Write 82.5
4K Mixed 38.7
135% 49.6 MB/s
DQ Read 228
DQ Write 182
DQ Mixed 168
136% 193 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 89.9%
Great: 103%
Amd-raid WDC WDS100T2G0A- 1TB
671GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UH510000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 22 27 33 4 3.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
36.1% Below average
Read 107
Write 59.9
Mixed 46.8
SusWrite 18.4
43% 57.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 2.2
342% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 36.1%
Great: 159%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3600 C18 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3400 MHz
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
93% Outstanding
MC Read 37.8
MC Write 25.3
MC Mixed 37.9
96% 33.7 GB/s
SC Read 27.8
SC Write 21.7
SC Mixed 37.8
83% 29.1 GB/s
Latency 90.4
44% 90.4 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 93%
Great: 126%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,279 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 129%
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation 130%

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $109

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $901
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-13600K $232Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $378WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback