Today's hottest deals

Microsoft Surface Pro 4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics9.34% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive83% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicrosoft Surface Pro 4  (all builds)
MotherboardMicrosoft Surface Pro 4
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display2736 x 1824 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 15 '22 at 20:51
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6650U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
41.6% Average
Memory 51.1
1-Core 85
2-Core 143
52% 93 Pts
4-Core 182
8-Core 213
26% 197 Pts
64-Core 204
13% 204 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Graphics 540
Microsoft(1414 0015) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 24.20.100.6299
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
9.34% Terrible
Lighting 11.9
Reflection 7.5
Parallax 10.5
10% 9.97 fps
MRender 10.5
Gravity 10.5
Splatting 10.6
9% 10.5 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 9.34%
Great: 9%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZFLV256HCHP-000MV 256GB
206GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BXV75M0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 297 291 303 302 306 307 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
83% Excellent
Read 621
Write 307
Mixed 283
SusWrite 301
84% 378 MB/s
4K Read 24.2
4K Write 49.1
4K Mixed 25.1
95% 32.8 MB/s
DQ Read 292
DQ Write 193
DQ Mixed 262
190% 249 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 83%
Great: 138%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB Row of chips LPDDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
58.3% Above average
MC Read 18.7
MC Write 34.1
MC Mixed 15.5
65% 22.8 GB/s
SC Read 4.7
SC Write 16.3
SC Mixed 11
30% 10.7 GB/s
Latency 157
26% 157 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Surface Pro 4 Builds (Compare 3,026 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Microsoft Surface Pro 4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback