BOXX RenderPro R9120

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics25.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive60.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemBOXX RenderPro R9120  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X10DRT-L
Memory124.5 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151217
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 10 '17 at 10:12
Run Duration92 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2695 v4
CPU1, 1 CPU, 18 cores, 36 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
75.6% Very good
Memory 83.3
1-Core 107
2-Core 204
75% 131 Pts
4-Core 366
8-Core 686
63% 526 Pts
64-Core 2,030
126% 2,030 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 75.6%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P1000
Nvidia(10DE 11BC) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1544 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 384.76
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
25.9% Poor
Lighting 32.5
Reflection 22.7
Parallax 27.3
26% 27.5 fps
MRender 26.9
Gravity 30
Splatting 33.1
25% 30 fps
Poor: 23%
This bench: 25.9%
Great: 25%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFS250G32TND-N1A2A 250GB
147GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 30000P10 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
60.4% Good
Read 510
Write 330
Mixed 351
88% 397 MB/s
4K Read 20.1
4K Write 23.6
4K Mixed 15.1
62% 19.6 MB/s
DQ Read 19
DQ Write 22.6
DQ Mixed 8.3
10% 16.6 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 60.4%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M391A2K43BB1-CRC 8x16GB
8 of 8 slots used
128GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
139% Outstanding
MC Read 65.6
MC Write 52.5
MC Mixed 51.5
162% 56.5 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 17.7
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 74.7
54% 74.7 ns
Poor: 116%
This bench: 139%
Great: 164%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback