Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results


Gaming 183% UFO	Desktop 95% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 167% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	198% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	81.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) (all builds)
Memory	24.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210810
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 15 '22 at 00:55
Run Duration	111 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	14%

PC Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$119 383,420 User benchmarks, average bench 96% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	96.3% Outstanding	Memory 76.1 1-Core 162 2-Core 323 99% 187 Pts	4-Core 626 8-Core 894 95% 760 Pts	64-Core 1104 68% 1104 Pts
Poor: 83% ↑ This bench: 96.3% Great: 107%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$835 158,856 User benchmarks, average bench 210% Zotac(19DA 1613) CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 527.56 Performing below potential (17^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	198% Outstanding	Lighting 289 Reflection 279 Parallax 322 236% 297 fps	MRender 318 Gravity 242 Splatting 181 194% 247 fps
Poor: 185% ↑ This bench: 198% Great: 230%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC WDS100T2B0B-00YS70 1TB 39,874 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 314GB free (System drive) Firmware: 415020WD SusWrite @10s intervals: 350 354 362 356 210 382 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	81.4% Excellent	Read 419 Write 320 Mixed 200 SusWrite 336 71% 319 MB/s	4K Read 27.9 4K Write 72.2 4K Mixed 27 115% 42.4 MB/s	DQ Read 229 DQ Write 192 DQ Mixed 175 141% 199 MB/s
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 81.4% Great: 115%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMWB8G1L2666A16W4 CMW16GX4M2A2666C16 CMWB8G1L2666A16W4 CMW16GX4M2A2666C16 32GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Performing below potential (12^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	66.3% Good	MC Read 27.9 MC Write 16 MC Mixed 25.7 66% 23.2 GB/s	SC Read 24.5 SC Write 16 SC Mixed 26.3 64% 22.3 GB/s	Latency 88.1 45% 88.1 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 66.3% Great: 72%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 25,844 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 129%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $192

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	4,652x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $175Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	4,264x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $119Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	3,416x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	2,239x
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	2,077x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	1,471x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $98Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	1,836x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $107Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	1,106x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $154Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	867x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	771x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	725x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $116Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	646x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 98% - Outstanding

Total price: $935

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16