HP EliteBook 835 G7 Notebook PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics11.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive121% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemHP EliteBook 835 G7 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8760
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220112
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 09 '22 at 12:20
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U Graphics
FP6, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
83.5% Excellent
Memory 70
1-Core 134
2-Core 270
84% 158 Pts
4-Core 521
8-Core 782
81% 652 Pts
64-Core 855
53% 855 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 83.5%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 4000 (iGPU)
HP(103C 8760) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.20.16.03
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
11.7% Very poor
Lighting 14.6
Reflection 13.6
Parallax 19.9
12% 16 fps
MRender 7.2
Gravity 15.9
Splatting 16.9
11% 13.3 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 11.7%
Great: 17%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MTFDHBA256TDV-1AY1AABHA 256GB
139GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS0032
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1084 1060 424 228 225 224 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
121% Outstanding
Read 1,152
Write 922
Mixed 981
SusWrite 541
201% 899 MB/s
4K Read 30.9
4K Write 26.2
4K Mixed 27.6
96% 28.2 MB/s
DQ Read 369
DQ Write 201
DQ Mixed 236
188% 269 MB/s
Poor: 121%
This bench: 121%
Great: 260%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMAA2GS6AJR8N-XN 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
47.2% Average
MC Read 18.9
MC Write 19
MC Mixed 12.9
48% 16.9 GB/s
SC Read 11.8
SC Write 15.1
SC Mixed 11.5
37% 12.8 GB/s
Latency 101
39% 101 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteBook 835 G7 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 36 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 835 G7 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback