AZW MINI S

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 31%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 25.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics2.43% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive55.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAZW MINI S  (all builds)
MotherboardAZW MINI S
Memory2.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220413
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 07 '22 at 10:22
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N5095A
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
25.7% Poor
Memory 18.5
1-Core 71.6
2-Core 143
39% 77.7 Pts
4-Core 186
8-Core 198
26% 192 Pts
64-Core 203
12% 203 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 25.7%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Intel(8086 2212) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9168
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
2.43% Terrible
Lighting 2.6
Reflection 3.4
Parallax 2.8
2% 2.93 fps
MRender 4.2
Gravity 3
Splatting 3.9
3% 3.7 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.43%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
256gb SSD 256GB
207GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN11986
SusWrite @10s intervals: 267 252 306 312 261 274 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
55.7% Above average
Read 334
Write 293
Mixed 319
SusWrite 279
69% 306 MB/s
4K Read 14.8
4K Write 30
4K Mixed 18
61% 20.9 MB/s
DQ Read 109
DQ Write 174
DQ Mixed 150
111% 144 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 167%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown DDR4 NB 8G 2666 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
19% Very poor
MC Read 6.3
MC Write 8.3
MC Mixed 6.1
20% 6.9 GB/s
SC Read 3.8
SC Write 6.5
SC Mixed 5.6
15% 5.3 GB/s
Latency 332
12% 332 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 19%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MINI S Builds (Compare 465 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: AZW MINI S

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $289Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback