Today's hottest deals

Acer Predator PT516-51s

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 95%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics107% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive534% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAcer Predator PT516-51s  (all builds)
MotherboardTGL Countryman_TLS
Memory20.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit färger, 2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220606
Uptime9.4 Days
Run DateDec 04 '22 at 20:25
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-11800H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
87.7% Excellent
Memory 74.6
1-Core 160
2-Core 310
96% 182 Pts
4-Core 540
8-Core 888
87% 714 Pts
64-Core 1,161
72% 1,161 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 87.7%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080 (Laptop)
Acer(1025 1532) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2935 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 527.37
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
107% Outstanding
Lighting 137
Reflection 162
Parallax 144
112% 148 fps
MRender 156
Gravity 115
Splatting 108
101% 126 fps
Poor: 96%
This bench: 107%
Great: 144%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 2TB
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2683 3872 3879 4010 3946 3997 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
534% Outstanding
Read 4,572
Write 4,212
Mixed 2,528
SusWrite 3,731
844% 3,761 MB/s
4K Read 50.3
4K Write 160
4K Mixed 71.8
253% 93.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,176
DQ Write 868
DQ Mixed 987
748% 1,011 MB/s
Poor: 148%
This bench: 534%
Great: 662%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMAA2GS6CJR8N-XN 2x16GB
2 of 8 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
98.6% Outstanding
MC Read 39.9
MC Write 39.6
MC Mixed 31
105% 36.8 GB/s
SC Read 17.4
SC Write 41.7
SC Mixed 18.6
74% 25.9 GB/s
Latency 91.2
44% 91.2 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 98.6%
Great: 99%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Predator PT516-51s Builds (Compare 415 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Predator PT516-51s

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $320
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback