Performance Results


Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 19% Surfboard	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	2.4% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	53.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Toshiba Satellite C50-A (all builds)
Motherboard	TOSHIBA Portable PC
Memory	0.5 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130916
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 04 '22 at 10:10
Run Duration	119 Seconds
Run User	LKA-User
Background CPU	32%

PC Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-3110M-$70 34,445 User benchmarks, average bench 48% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	36.7% Below average	Memory 49.1 1-Core 59 2-Core 84.1 39% 64.1 Pts	4-Core 140 8-Core 149 19% 145 Pts	64-Core 147 9% 147 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 36.7% Great: 58%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) 409,110 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Toshiba(1179 FA20) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252 Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	2.4% Terrible	Lighting 3.2 Reflection 1.3 Parallax 2.3 3% 2.27 fps	MRender 2.5 Gravity 1.6 Splatting 3 2% 2.37 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.4% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Aitc FM250 256GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 195GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2107XKR SusWrite @10s intervals: 334 197 356 340 199 138 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	53.8% Above average	Read 407 Write 353 Mixed 107 SusWrite 260 63% 282 MB/s	4K Read 17.5 4K Write 28.9 4K Mixed 5.8 49% 17.4 MB/s	DQ Read 197 DQ Write 148 DQ Mixed 31.8 62% 126 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 53.8% Great: 84%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Team Team-Ind-1600 1x2GB 34 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 1 of 2 slots used 2GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	10.2% Very poor	MC Read 3.9 MC Write 3 MC Mixed 3.2 10% 3.37 GB/s	SC Read 1.1 SC Write 1.4 SC Mixed 2.3 5% 1.6 GB/s	Latency 164 24% 164 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 10.2% Great: 18%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 47%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i3-3110MIntel $70Bench 48%, 34,445 samples	51x
Celeron N2820Intel $139Bench 27%, 2,102 samples	44x
Pentium 2020MIntelBench 47%, 9,778 samples	27x

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	74x
HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 90,156 samples	68x
HD Graphics (G3 Pentium/Celeron 1.0/1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 28,701 samples	53x

RAM
M471B5173DB0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 24%, 51,191 samples	25x
M471B5173QH0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 25%, 38,580 samples	24x
M471B5273CH0-YK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 46%, 2,928 samples	8x

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $84

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $23	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16