Today's hottest deals

Acer Predator PH315-55

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics20.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive336% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAcer Predator PH315-55  (all builds)
MotherboardADL Evoque_ADH
Memory25.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220413
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 03 '22 at 00:16
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12700H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
64.8% Good
Memory 52.8
1-Core 97.3
2-Core 201
62% 117 Pts
4-Core 411
8-Core 722
68% 566 Pts
64-Core 1,268
78% 1,268 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 64.8%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Acer(1025 1598) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 30.0.101.1029
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
20.6% Poor
Lighting 25.3
Reflection 12.5
Parallax 16.4
21% 18.1 fps
MRender 25.8
Gravity 32.6
Splatting 19.1
20% 25.8 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 20.6%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme WD PC SN810 SDCQNRY-512G-1014 512GB
404GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 61470100 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3286 1114 913 979 1009 967 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
336% Outstanding
Read 3,900
Write 3,697
Mixed 2,412
SusWrite 1,378
636% 2,846 MB/s
4K Read 22.5
4K Write 148
4K Mixed 67.9
200% 79.5 MB/s
DQ Read 810
DQ Write 634
DQ Mixed 703
531% 715 MB/s
Poor: 245%
This bench: 336%
Great: 479%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance SODIM 4800 C40 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
112% Outstanding
MC Read 50.5
MC Write 36.7
MC Mixed 47.8
129% 45 GB/s
SC Read 12.5
SC Write 21.9
SC Mixed 17.3
49% 17.2 GB/s
Latency 151
26% 151 ns
Poor: 112%
This bench: 112%
Great: 154%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Predator PH315-55 Builds (Compare 1,713 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

System: Acer Predator PH315-55

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback