Asus NCCH-DL

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	2.5GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 2.5GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (57%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Asus NCCH-DL (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK NCCH-DL
Memory	0.8 GB free of 2.5 GB
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20050829
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Nov 07 '17 at 20:46
Run Duration	144 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	57%

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon 3.20GHz 7 User benchmarks, average bench 32% Socket 604, 2 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	33.6% Below average	Memory 57.3 1-Core 25.4 2-Core 40.8 30% 41.2 Pts	4-Core 59.6 8-Core 66.3 8% 63 Pts	64-Core 70.4 4% 70.4 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 33.6% Great: 34%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Hitachi HDS722525VLSA80 250GB 513 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 196GB free Firmware: V36OA63A Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 78 78 38683148747 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 2413 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 110 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 2896 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2400 (C0) Power-off retract count 98 98 2416 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 98 98 2416 (C2) HDA temperature 148 148 180389543973 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 110 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 1 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 166	20.2% Poor	Read 31.8 Write 38.1 Mixed 20.9 22% 30.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.58 4K Write 1.56 4K Mixed 0.33 90% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 20.2% Great: 32%
Hitachi HDS722525VLSA80 250GB 513 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 97GB free (System drive) Firmware: V36OA63A Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 92 92 30090133875 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 2588 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 22 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 2965 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2576 (C0) Power-off retract count 98 98 2593 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 98 98 2593 (C2) HDA temperature 134 134 188979478569 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 22 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 1	17.1% Very poor	Read 32.3 Write 26.9 Mixed 16.9 19% 25.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.55 4K Write 1.35 4K Mixed 0.27 78% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 17.1% Great: 32%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2GB 9,823 User benchmarks, average bench 15% null MHz 512, 1024, 512, 512 MB Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	6.82% Terrible	MC Read 1.6 MC Write 1.9 MC Mixed 1.6 5% 1.7 GB/s	SC Read 1.5 SC Write 1.7 SC Mixed 1.7 5% 1.63 GB/s	Latency 136 29% 136 ns
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 6.82% Great: 27%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $153
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363

Asus NCCH-DL

Performance Results

PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)