Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 21% Surfboard	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 17.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	1.45% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	42.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium J4205 1,095 User benchmarks, average bench 33% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 1.95 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	17.4% Very poor	Memory 16.4 1-Core 41 2-Core 73.9 23% 43.8 Pts	4-Core 105 8-Core 114 14% 109 Pts	64-Core 88.7 6% 88.7 Pts
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 17.4% Great: 40%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 505 2,850 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Intel(8086 2212) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111 Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	1.45% Terrible	Lighting 1.7 Reflection 1.9 Parallax 2.9 1% 2.17 fps	MRender 1.3 Gravity 4.9 Splatting 0.2 2% 2.13 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.45% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
JAJMS600M512G 512GB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 248GB free (System drive) Firmware: U0128A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 269 17 16 195 14 11 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	42.1% Average	Read 358 Write 309 Mixed 282 SusWrite 87.1 58% 259 MB/s	4K Read 15 4K Write 31.6 4K Mixed 15.1 59% 20.6 MB/s	DQ Read 100 DQ Write 103 DQ Mixed 42.4 48% 81.9 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 42.1% Great: 91%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
ABCD 123456789012345678 4x3GB 488 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 4 of 4 slots used 12GB DIMM LPDDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	17.3% Very poor	MC Read 4.8 MC Write 9 MC Mixed 6.2 19% 6.67 GB/s	SC Read 2.1 SC Write 4 SC Mixed 2.8 8% 2.97 GB/s	Latency 348 12% 348 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 17.3% Great: 28%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 25%

Surfboard

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 22%

Surfboard

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	487x
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples	478x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $239Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	460x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	1,369x
Atermiter 2x8GBUnknownBench 59%, 2,316 samples	490x
123456789012345678 4x2GBABCDBench 24%, 5,869 samples	354x

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $87

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16