Machinist X79 (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics2.34% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardMachinist X79 (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset  (all builds)
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220214
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 25 '22 at 22:54
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2470 v2
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
69.1% Good
Memory 83.9
1-Core 63.1
2-Core 143
58% 96.8 Pts
4-Core 293
8-Core 574
51% 433 Pts
64-Core 856
53% 856 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 69.1%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6750
Sapphire(174B 6750) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
2.34% Terrible
Lighting 0.1
Reflection 10.5
Parallax 9.2
0% 6.6 fps
MRender 8.9
Gravity 8.4
Splatting 7.6
7% 8.3 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 2.34%
Great: 9%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST3160318AS 160GB-$43
100GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC38
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.6 2.4 2.7 2.8 2.4 2.9 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 502
Write 4
Mixed 6
SusWrite 2.6
92% 129 MB/s
4K Read 2.9
4K Mixed 0
181% 1.45 MB/s
Poor: 14% Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B5170FH0- 2x4GB
2 of 8 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
49.6% Average
MC Read 20.2
MC Write 17.6
MC Mixed 16.3
52% 18 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 9.4
SC Mixed 9.5
30% 10.4 GB/s
Latency 73.6
54% 73.6 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X79 (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset Builds (Compare 83 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Machinist X79 (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 37% - Below average Total price: $107
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $153
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback