MSI MS-16J5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics11.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive66.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star GE62 6QD
MotherboardMSI MS-16J5  (all builds)
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151027
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 20 '22 at 14:02
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 44%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
55.8% Above average
Memory 62.3
1-Core 82.5
2-Core 138
55% 94.4 Pts
4-Core 276
8-Core 336
40% 306 Pts
64-Core 341
21% 341 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960M
MSI(1462 115A) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.2698
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
11.7% Very poor
Lighting 13.3
Reflection 16.3
Parallax 13.4
11% 14.3 fps
MRender 22.3
Gravity 12.9
Splatting 14.7
13% 16.6 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 11.7%
Great: 18%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFS128G39MNC-3310A 128GB
67GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20001P00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 284 290 236 296 271 263 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
66.4% Good
Read 364
Write 300
Mixed 256
SusWrite 273
67% 298 MB/s
4K Read 17.3
4K Write 33.8
4K Mixed 20.8
71% 24 MB/s
DQ Read 348
DQ Write 247
DQ Mixed 236
193% 277 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 66.4%
Great: 92%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
912GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 132 131 123 125 129 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
75.8% Very good
Read 136
Write 108
Mixed 25.2
SusWrite 128
72% 99.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
124% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA41GS6AFR8N-TF 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
51.1% Above average
MC Read 19
MC Write 21.4
MC Mixed 17
55% 19.1 GB/s
SC Read 9.3
SC Write 14.6
SC Mixed 10.9
33% 11.6 GB/s
Latency 121
33% 121 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-16J5 Builds (Compare 1,645 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-16J5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback