Today's hottest deals

Asus PRIME Z690-P WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 113%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 82%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 112%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics59% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive499% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus PRIME Z690-P WIFI  (all builds)
Memory56.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farger
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220812
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 12 '22 at 17:19
Run Duration236 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12700K-$214
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Memory 75.2
1-Core 203
2-Core 406
117% 228 Pts
4-Core 799
8-Core 1,500
137% 1,149 Pts
64-Core 2,369
147% 2,369 Pts
Poor: 107%
This bench: 112%
Great: 121%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Asus(1043 8618) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 526.47
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
59% Above average
Lighting 73.7
Reflection 75.8
Parallax 70.2
60% 73.2 fps
MRender 67.5
Gravity 72.3
Splatting 68.7
57% 69.5 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 59%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme KINGSTON SFYRS1000G 1TB
812GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EIFK31.6 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4151 4346 4006 1548 1580 1397 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
499% Outstanding
Read 2,935
Write 5,008
Mixed 3,256
SusWrite 2,838
796% 3,509 MB/s
4K Read 73.4
4K Write 325
4K Mixed 135
456% 178 MB/s
DQ Read 1,644
DQ Write 1,328
DQ Mixed 1,520
1,129% 1,497 MB/s
Poor: 229%
This bench: 499%
Great: 606%
Nvme Samsung SSD 960 EVO 250GB
233GB free
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1360 310 309 309 309 308 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
244% Outstanding
Read 2,149
Write 1,475
Mixed 644
SusWrite 484
262% 1,188 MB/s
4K Read 48
4K Write 204
4K Mixed 59.1
256% 104 MB/s
DQ Read 1,054
DQ Write 1,276
DQ Mixed 810
709% 1,046 MB/s
Poor: 158%
This bench: 244%
Great: 244%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$82
175GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 146 150 149 148 150 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
63.4% Good
Read 72.2
Write 101
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 148
70% 95.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 0.4
178% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 63.4%
Great: 90%
Seagate ST18000NM000J-2TV103 18TB
9.5TB free
Firmware: SN02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 228 231 233 234 231 230 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 10% Great: 33%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMT32GX5M2B5200C40 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4000 MHz
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
140% Outstanding
MC Read 52.8
MC Write 56.2
MC Mixed 51.5
153% 53.5 GB/s
SC Read 19.7
SC Write 49.1
SC Mixed 29.9
94% 32.9 GB/s
Latency 90
44% 90 ns
Poor: 122%
This bench: 140%
Great: 177%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME Z690-P WIFI Builds (Compare 5,454 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 209%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 114%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 233%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME Z690-P WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $1,032
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback