Lenovo 80SR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics6.01% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive41.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 80SR  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Toronto 5A1
Memory3.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180809
Uptime3.1 Days
Run DateNov 11 '22 at 04:08
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 38%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6500U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
51.6% Above average
Memory 75
1-Core 66.5
2-Core 114
53% 85.3 Pts
4-Core 169
8-Core 147
22% 158 Pts
64-Core 157
10% 157 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia 940MX
Legend(17AA 3824) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 22.21.13.8264
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
6.01% Terrible
Lighting 6.9
Reflection 3.7
Parallax 10.8
6% 7.13 fps
MRender 6.9
Gravity 11.7
Splatting 6.7
7% 8.43 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.01%
Great: 10%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
RX7 2.5 240GB
94GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FW2O1219
SusWrite @10s intervals: 279 294 145 3.1 4.1 4.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
41.1% Average
Read 324
Write 274
Mixed 268
SusWrite 122
55% 247 MB/s
4K Read 15.9
4K Write 24.4
4K Mixed 8.4
48% 16.2 MB/s
DQ Read 119
DQ Write 187
DQ Mixed 19.7
52% 109 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 41.1%
Great: 79%
Toshiba MK1676GSX H 160GB
93GB free
Firmware: GS001Y
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 65 65 65 65 65 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
35.2% Below average
Read 57.6
Write 51.1
Mixed 18.9
SusWrite 64.9
35% 48.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
119% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 35.2%
Great: 48%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244BB0-CPB M471A5143EB0-CPB 8GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
46.9% Average
MC Read 17.9
MC Write 17.9
MC Mixed 15.4
49% 17.1 GB/s
SC Read 8.4
SC Write 12.6
SC Mixed 11.5
31% 10.8 GB/s
Latency 90.3
44% 90.3 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 46.9%
Great: 68%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 80SR Builds (Compare 673 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 80SR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 28% - Poor Total price: $38
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback