Today's hottest deals

Apple iMacPro1,1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics64.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemApple iMacPro1,1  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-7BA5B2D9E42DDD94
Memory59.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display5120 x 2880 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220929
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 09 '22 at 17:53
Run Duration202 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon W-2150B
CPU0, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
82.9% Excellent
Memory 79.3
1-Core 117
2-Core 233
79% 143 Pts
4-Core 464
8-Core 888
80% 676 Pts
64-Core 1,339
83% 1,339 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 82.9%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64
Apple(106B 017C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1350 MHz, MLim: 786 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 22.10.1
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
64.4% Good
Lighting 81.5
Reflection 87.6
Parallax 50.7
66% 73.3 fps
MRender 72.9
Gravity 90.5
Splatting 62
60% 75.1 fps
Poor: 64%
This bench: 64.4%
Great: 90%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apple APPLE SSD AP2048 2TB
714GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 129
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1966 2071 2148 2175 2155 2124 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Corsair Force MP600 NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$167
836GB free
Firmware: EGFM11.3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 654 704 703 707 708 708 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
93.7% Outstanding
Read 894
Write 163
Mixed 277
SusWrite 697
112% 508 MB/s
4K Read 34.1
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 3.1
56% 12.9 MB/s
Poor: 183%
This bench: 93.7%
Great: 496%
Samsung Portable SSD T5 1TB
181GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 461 353 307 307 307 307 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
74.6% Very good
Read 486
Write 464
Mixed 412
SusWrite 340
96% 426 MB/s
4K Read 23
4K Write 38.7
4K Mixed 27.9
91% 29.9 MB/s
DQ Read 108
DQ Write 157
DQ Mixed 126
97% 130 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA82GR7AFR4N-VK 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
120% Outstanding
MC Read 52.6
MC Write 50
MC Mixed 41.4
137% 48 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 21.5
SC Mixed 18.1
50% 17.6 GB/s
Latency 81.8
49% 81.8 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 120%
Great: 134%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical iMacPro1,1 Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 72%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship

System: Apple iMacPro1,1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 142% - Outstanding Total price: $167
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback