Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-Z790 AERO G

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 133%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics236% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z790 AERO G  (all builds)
Memory55.4 GB free of 64 GB
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit kleuren,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220922
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 06 '22 at 14:49
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-13900K-$442
U3E1, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 5.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
133% Outstanding
Memory 83.7
1-Core 243
2-Core 488
138% 271 Pts
4-Core 976
8-Core 1903
170% 1,439 Pts
64-Core 4,405
273% 4,405 Pts
Poor: 123%
This bench: 133%
Great: 135%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-Ti
Nvidia(10DE 1618) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 512.16
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
236% Outstanding
Lighting 350
Reflection 321
Parallax 365
286% 346 fps
MRender 394
Gravity 314
Splatting 207
239% 305 fps
Poor: 205%
This bench: 236%
Great: 247%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90
835GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,467
Write 2,443
Mixed 2,348
541% 2,420 MB/s
4K Read 83.7
4K Write 263
4K Mixed 126
428% 158 MB/s
DQ Read 2,405
DQ Write 1,777
DQ Mixed 2,045
1,541% 2,075 MB/s
Poor: 266% Great: 477%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$195
2TB free
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,787
Write 3,308
Mixed 3,042
684% 3,046 MB/s
4K Read 84.9
4K Write 274
4K Mixed 126
435% 161 MB/s
DQ Read 2,571
DQ Write 1,929
DQ Mixed 2,216
1,666% 2,239 MB/s
Poor: 278% Great: 508%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMH32GX5M2B5200C40 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 5200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
178% Outstanding
MC Read 72.2
MC Write 70.3
MC Mixed 66.7
199% 69.7 GB/s
SC Read 22.8
SC Write 51.2
SC Mixed 34.1
103% 36 GB/s
Latency 73.9
54% 73.9 ns
Poor: 121%
This bench: 178%
Great: 178%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z790 AERO G Builds (Compare 1,104 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 453%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 125%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 596%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z790 AERO G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $2,476
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $275WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $379WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $258Nvidia RTX 4070 $278Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback