Asrock FM2A75M-HD+

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.92% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (93%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock FM2A75M-HD+  (all builds)
Memory5 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20131120
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 02 '22 at 10:00
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU 93%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-5600K APU-$250
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
47.7% Average
Memory 76
1-Core 32.7
2-Core 91.4
43% 66.7 Pts
4-Core 114
8-Core 130
16% 122 Pts
64-Core 148
9% 148 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7560D
ASRock(1849 9904) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
2.92% Terrible
Lighting 3.3
Reflection 4.4
Parallax 4.2
3% 3.97 fps
MRender 2.2
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 5.5
3% 3.87 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.92%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 120GB
35GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UE4500RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 14 18 20 21 23 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 29% Great: 55%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
17.3% Very poor
MC Read 7.5
MC Write 3.4
MC Mixed 5.1
15% 5.33 GB/s
SC Read 4
SC Write 3.2
SC Mixed 4.5
11% 3.9 GB/s
Latency 88.3
45% 88.3 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 17.3%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FM2A75M-HD+ Builds (Compare 20 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A75M-HD+

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $116
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback