Today's hottest deals

HPE ProLiant DL325 Gen10 Plus v2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Memory256GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 256GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHPE ProLiant DL325 Gen10 Plus v2  (all builds)
MotherboardHPE ProLiant DL325 Gen10 Plus v2
Memory248.7 GB free of 256 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220811
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 31 '22 at 02:54
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 36%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD EPYC 7443P 24-Core
Proc 1, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 48 threads
Base clock 2.85 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
51.2% Above average
Memory 61.6
1-Core 62.1
2-Core 125
49% 83 Pts
4-Core 220
8-Core 444
39% 332 Pts
64-Core 2,868
178% 2,868 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 96%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$140
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,319
Write 2,081
Mixed 1,666
450% 2,022 MB/s
4K Read 58.2
4K Write 160
4K Mixed 80.8
276% 99.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,206
DQ Write 951
DQ Mixed 1,098
817% 1,085 MB/s
Poor: 223% Great: 435%
Samsung 870 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 2B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 425
Write 436
Mixed 393
93% 418 MB/s
4K Read 34.1
4K Write 77.3
4K Mixed 47
153% 52.8 MB/s
DQ Read 305
DQ Write 206
DQ Mixed 246
186% 252 MB/s
Poor: 53% Great: 119%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 32GB
24GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 141
Write 35.3
Mixed 38.3
70% 71.4 MB/s
4K Read 7.3
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1.4
129% 3.43 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 48%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA84GR7DJR4N-XN HMA84GR7DJR4N-XN HMA84GR7DJR4N-XN Samsung M393A4K40EB3-CWE Samsung M393A4K40EB3-CWE Samsung M393A4K40EB3-CWE HMA84GR7DJR4N-XN HMA84GR7DJR4N-XN 255GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200, 3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767 MB
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
134% Outstanding
MC Read 85.8
MC Write 34.5
MC Mixed 41.4
154% 53.9 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 30.3
SC Mixed 22.4
62% 21.8 GB/s
Latency 123
32% 123 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 134%
Great: 134%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $72
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback